.."the society escapes my memory now..."

Could it be because this is the exception rather than the rule ?

Maybe so but the fact is that it has happened before, so it is not without precedence.


"Where in the Gleaner account, does it say that his wife was given the option of saying "no" to bringing the Trini into the home ?"

I think the answer to that question can be found in the following quote taken from the very article.

"She adds that before Pat was brought into the family she and her husband discussed the issue and the decision was taken by both of them."


"The fact still remain that (at least in my opinion) if a so dem want live society should mind dem own business and leave dem alone."

Seems to me slaveowners in the American South made a similar argument not too long ago.

A poor and somewhat intellectually dishonest comparison. The difference between what the southern racists are advocating and what I am advocating can be summed up in two words: FREE WILL!!!!!!!!

"The fact that wives may or may not have been allowed to have multiple spouses is neither here nor there."

To a man at any rate.

Mi fren, a dat mek it discriminatory !

The smae two words apply here as well!!!!!!!!

Peace!!!!!!!!