Yuku free message boards
Username or E-mail:
Password:
Forgot
Password?
Sign Up
Grab the Yuku app
Search:
RSS
Email
Flayva Interactive
>
Under The Mango Tree
>
MERRY CHRISTMAS !
0 Points
Search this Topic:
Remove this ad
«Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
Next»
Jump
Forum Jump
Under The Mango Tree
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Re: MERRY CHRISTMAS !
Author
Comment
Yard Guard
Shush . . it will be . .
#1
[-]
Posts
: 2642
Dec 30 03 8:38 AM
More
My Recent Posts
Ann J. Unu mussi have free media there in TO. The rest of Canada not so lucky. No maam I aint hear of the crook. If him doan rob the poor and needy mi sorry fi him. Di cops mi no like period a di lying thiefin ones who thief di property of arrested persons and telllie pon people especially minorities. A wonder a wha mek dem decide fi hang him out to dry.
Yes back up all yu want. Seaga nuh haffi go a court go prove sey Skeng Don illiterate. He is the defendant/respondent and him done sey Skeng nuh have nuh reputation whey cud be harmed by his comment (even yu accept that) read that to mean among other things Skeng is not considered literate by anyone anywhere. Furthermore, as opposition leader he claims to the court that he has the right to criticise how, why where, who and when government contracts are granted. It is that aspect of his claim which the court has blundered badly by rejecting and which he is spending his time to pursue at the Court of appeal and Privy council if need be. Seaga simply has made the decision to direct his energies and money where it matters. The advertising cost for apologizing he got as remedy he won against the radio station in Mobay. All of you have been misled by those goat heads who have you believe Seaga actually lost in his legal manouvres. You all dont seem to appreciate that the court looked at three cases two filed against Seaga and one filed by him. He got an ward from the one he filed that covers the award given to the two persons who filed against him and then he has what remains. Who lost then? What in any of that tells you Seaga could not prove that Skeng is illiterate. It just vloops past yu when Rich D point out that it seems yu can libel smaddy with the truth. Massa libel has to be a lie. People make legal decisions based on other than whether or not they can provide proof. Skeng as the complainant/applicant had the onus of proving his case, which is basically that he is not illiterate and yu and mi and di res a di worl know seh him damn well cudden do that. Michael Jackson found it cheaper to pay off the first boy than keep fighting with mangy mouth Sneddon. (anybody notice how dat man mouth look mangy?) Pity he did not foresee this other one and now he learns it is better to fight them off or others will take invitation.
So let me repeat for your benefit, Seaga is not required to prove that Skeng is illiterate. It is Skeng who is required to prove he is not hence prove that Seaga spoke falsely.
Look yu kno Yardy, yu find it impossible to shed your partisan political allegiance but I have done away with that a long time ago. So now I see a damn fool whenever one shows its stupid head. Why would anybody take anybody to court because they call them illiterate and they can't produce proof of a university level education in a day and age when even university graduates are damn well illiterate?
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Forum Jump
Under The Mango Tree
Share This
Email to Friend
del.icio.us
Digg it
Facebook
Blogger
Yahoo MyWeb
«Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
Next»
Jump
Flayva Interactive
>
Under The Mango Tree
>
MERRY CHRISTMAS !
Click to subscribe by RSS
Click to receive E-mail notifications of replies